Asperger Syndrome: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Intervention
Best viewed withFirefox orGoogle Chrome  

Asperger Syndrome: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Intervention

Asperger syndrome (AS) is a severe developmental disorder characterized by major difficulties in social interaction, and restricted and usual patterns of interest and behavior.  There are many similarities with autism without mental retardation (or “Higher Functioning Autism”), and the issue of whether Asperger syndrome and Higher Functioning Autism are different conditions is not resolved.  To some extent, the answer to this question depends on the way clinicians and researcher make use of this diagnostic concept since until recently, there was no “official” definition of Asperger syndrome.  The lack of a consensual definition led to a great deal of confusion, as researchers could not interpret other researcher’s findings.  Clinicians felt free to use the label based on their own interpretations or misinterpretations of what Asperger syndrome “really” meant, and parents were often faced with a diagnosis that nobody appeared to understand very well, and worse still, nobody appeared to know what to do about it.  School districts were not aware of the conditions, insurance carriers could not reimburse services provided on the basis of this “unofficial” diagnosis and there was no published information providing parents and clinicians alike with guidelines on the meaning and implications of Asperger syndrome, including what should the diagnostic evaluation consist of and what forms of treatment and interventions were warranted.
 
This situation has changed somewhat since Asperger syndrome was made “official” in DSM-IV (APA, 1994), following a large international field trial involving over a thousand children and adolescents with autism and related disorders (Volkmer et al., 1994).  The field trials revealed some evidence justifying the inclusion of Asperger syndrome as a diagnostic category different from autism, under the overarching class of Pervasive Developmental Disorders.  More importantly, it established a consensual definition for the disorder, which should serve as the frame of reference for all those using the diagnosis.  However, the problems are far from over.  Despite some new research leads, knowledge on Asperger syndrome is still very limited.  For example, we don’t really know how common it is, or the male/female ratio, or to what extent there may be genetic links increasing the likelihood of finding similar conditions in family members.
 
Clearly, the work on Asperger syndrome, in regard to scientific research as well as in regard to service provision, is only beginning.  Parents are urged to use a great deal of caution and to adopt a critical approach toward information given to them.  Ultimately, the diagnostic label-any label, does not summarize a person, and there is a need to consider the individual’s strengths and weaknesses, and to provide individualized intervention that will meet those (adequately assessed and monitored) needs.  That notwithstanding, we are left with the question of what is the nature of this puzzling social learning disability, how many people does it affect, and what can we do to help those affected by it.  The following guidelines summarize some of the information currently available on those questions.
Background
 
Autism is the most widely recognized pervasive developmental disorder (PDD).  Other diagnostic concepts with features somewhat similar to autism have been less intensively studied, and their validity, apart from autism, is more controversial.  One of these conditions, termed Asperger syndrome (AS) was originally described by Hans Asperger (1944, see Frith’s translation, 1991), who provided an account of a number of cases whose clinical features resembled Kanner’s (1943) description of autism (e.g., problems with social interaction and communication, and circumscribed and idiosyncratic patterns of interest).  However, Asperger’s description differed from Kanner’s in that speech was less commonly delayed, motor deficits were more common, the onset appeared to be somewhat later, and all the initial cases occurred only in boys.  Asperger also suggested that similar problems could be observed in family members, particularly fathers.
 
This syndrome was essentially unknown in the English literature for many years.  An influential review and series of case reports by Lorna Wing (1981) increased interest in the condition, and since then, both the usage of the term in clinical practice and number of case reports and research studies have been steadily increasing.  The commonly described clinical features of the syndrome include a) paucity of empathy; b) na├»ve, inappropriate, one-sided social interaction, little ability to form friendships and consequent social isolation; c) pedantic and monotonic speech; d) poor non-verbal communication; e) intense absorption in circumscribed topics such as weather, facts about TV stations, railway tables or maps, which are learned in rote fashion and reflect poor understanding, conveying the impression of eccentricity; and f) clumsy and ill-coordinated movements and odd posture.
 
Although Asperger originally reported the condition only in boys, reports of girls with the syndrome have now appeared.  Nevertheless, boys are significantly more likely to be affected.  Although most children with the condition function in the normal range of intelligence, some have been reported as mildly retarded.  The apparent onset of the condition, or at least its recognition, is probably somewhat later than autism; this may reflect the more preserved language and cognitive abilities.  It tends to be highly stable, and the higher intellectual skills observed suggest a better long-term outcome than is typically observed in autism.
 
Related Diagnostic Concepts
 
Several similar diagnostic concepts originating from adult psychiatry, neuropsychology, neurology, and other disciplines share, to a great degree, the phenomenological aspects of AS.  For example, Wolff and colleagues described a group of individuals with an abnormal pattern behavior characterized by social isolation, rigidity of thought and habits, and an unusual style of communication.  This condition was named schizoid personality disorder in childhood.   Unfortunately, a developmental account of his concept was not provided, making it difficult to ascertain the extent to which the individuals described may have also exhibited autistic-like symptomatology early on in life.  More generally, the understanding of AS as an unchanging personality trait fails to fully appreciate the developmental aspects of the disorder, which may prove to be of great importance for differential diagnosis.
 
In neuropsychology, a great deal of research has been devoted to Rourke’s (1989) concept of Nonverbal Learning Disabilities syndrome (NLD).  The main contribution of this line of research has been the attempt to delineate the implications for the child’s social and emotional development of a unique profile of neuropsychological assets and deficits that appear to have a deleterious impact on the person’s capacity for socialization as well as on the person’s interactive and communicative styles.  The neuropsychological characteristics of individuals with the NLD profile include deficits in tactile perception, psychomotor coordination, visual-spatial organization, nonverbal problem solving, and appreciation of incongruities and humor.  NLD individuals also exhibit well developed rote verbal capacities and verbal memory skills, difficulty in adapting to novel and complex situations, and over reliance on rote behaviors in such situations, relative deficits in mechanical arithmetic as compared to proficiencies in single-word reading, poor pragmatics and prosody in speech, and significant deficits in social perception, social judgment, and social interaction skills.  There are marked deficits in the appreciation of subtle and even fairly obvious nonverbal aspects of communication, that often result in social disdain and rejection.  As a result, NLD individuals show a marked tendency toward social withdrawal and are at risk for development of serious mood disorders.
 
Many of the clinical features clustered together in NLD have also been described in the neurological literature as a form of Developmental Learning Disability of the Right Hemisphere (Denckla, 1983; Voeller, 1986).  Children presenting with this condition have also been shown to exhibit profound disturbances in interpretation and expression of affect and other basic interpersonal skills.  Finally, an additional term researched in the literature, semantic-pragmatic disorder (Bishop, 1989), has also captured aspects of NLD and AS.
 
It is currently unclear whether these concepts describe different entities or, more probably, provide different perspectives on a heterogeneous, yet overlapping, group of individuals sharing at least some common aspects.  An important goal of current research is to seek a convergence between the various discipline-specific accounts in order to make use of different methodologies in the effort to validate the behaviorally defined concept of AS.  However, in order to enhance comparability of studies, it is of great importance to establish consensual and stringent guidelines for the diagnosis of AS, particularly in regard to its similarities with related conditions.
 
Categorical Definition and Clinical Description:
 
As defined in DSM-IV (the most recent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, 1994), the tentative criteria for AS follow the same format, and in fact overlap to some degree, the criteria for autism.  The required symptomatology is clustered in terms of onset, social and emotional, and “restricted interests” criteria, with the addition of two common but not necessary characteristics involving motor deficits and isolated special skills, respectively.
 
A final criterion involves the necessary exclusion of other conditions, most importantly autism or a subthreshold (or “autistic-like”) form of autism (Pervasive Developmental Disorder – Not Otherwise Specified).  Interestingly, the DSM-IV definition of AS is offered having autism as its point of reference; hence some of the criteria actually involve the absence of abnormalities in some areas of functioning that are affected in autism.  The following table summarized the DSM-IV definition of AS:
 
DSM-IV-TR definition of Asperger Syndrome (called “Asperger Disorder”) (APA, 1994)

A. Qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:
 
  1. marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures, and gestures to regulate social interaction
  2. failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level
  3. a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g., by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest to other people.
  4. lack of social or emotional reciprocity
 
B. Restricted repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests and activities, as manifested by at least one of the following:
 
  1. encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus
  2. apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals
  3. stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g., hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements)
  4. persistent preoccupation with parts or objects
 
C. The disturbance causes clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
 
D.    There is no clinically significant general delay in language (e.g. single words used by age 2 years, communicative phrases used by               age 3 years).
 
E. There is no clinically significant delay in cognitive development or in the development of age-appropriate self-help skills, adaptive                 behavior (other than in social interaction), and curiosity about the environment in childhood.
  
F. Criteria are not met for another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or Schizophrenia
 
Onset Criteria
 
In DSM-IV, the individual’s history must show “a lack of any clinically significant general delay” in language acquisition, cognitive development and adaptive behavior (other than in social interaction).  This contrasts with typical developmental accounts of autistic children who show marked deficits and deviance in these areas prior to the age of 3 years.
 
Although the onset criterion is in agreement with Asperger’s account, Wing (1981) noted the presence of deficits in the use of language for communication, if not in more specific language skills, in some of her case studies.  It is currently uncertain whether the lack of delays in the prescribed areas is a differential factor between AS and autism or, alternatively, a simple reflection of the higher developmental level associated with the usage of the term AS.
 
Other common descriptions of the early development of individuals with AS include a certain precociousness in learning to talk (“he talked before he could walk”), a fascination with letters and numbers-in fact, the young child may even be able to decode words although with little or no understanding (“hyperplexia”)-and the establishment of attachment patterns to family members but inappropriate approaches to peers and other persons, rather than withdrawal or aloofness as in autism (e.g., the child may attempt to initiate contact with other children by hugging them or screaming at them and then puzzle at their responses).  Again, these behaviors are not uncommonly described for higher-functioning autistic children as well, albeit much more infrequently.
 
Qualitative Impairments in Reciprocal Social Interaction
 
Although the social criteria for AS and autism are identical, the former condition usually involves fewer symptoms and has a generally different presentation than does the latter.  Individuals with AS are often socially isolated but are not unaware of the presence of others, even though their approaches may be inappropriate and peculiar.  For example, they may engage the interlocutor, usually an adult, in one-sided conversation characterized by long-winded, pedantic speech, about a favorite and often unusual and narrow topic.  Also, although individuals with AS are often socially isolated but are not unaware of the presence of others, even though their approaches may be inappropriate and peculiar.  Also, although individuals with AS are often self-described “loners”, they often express a great interest in making friendships and meeting people.  These wishes are invariable thwarted by their awkward approaches and insensitivity to other person’s feelings, intentions, and nonliteral and implied communications (e.g., signs of boredom, haste to leave, and need for privacy).  Chronically frustrated by their repeated failures to engage others and make friendships, some of these individuals develop symptoms of depression that may require treatment, including medication.
  
In regard to the emotional aspects of social transactions, individuals with AS may react inappropriately to, or fail to interpret the valence of, the context of the affective interaction, often conveying a sense of insensitivity, formality, or disregard to the other person’s emotional expressions.  That notwithstanding, they may be able to describe correctly, in a cognitive and often formalistic fashion, other people’s emotions, expected intentions and social conventions, but are unable to act upon this knowledge in an intuitive and spontaneous fashion, thus losing the tempo of the interaction.
 
Such poor intuition and lack of spontaneous adaptation are accompanied by marked reliance on formalistic rules of behavior and rigid social conventions.  This presentation is largely responsible for the impression of social naivete and behavioral rigidity that is so forcefully conveyed by these individuals.
 
As with the majority of the behavioral aspects used to describe AS, at least some of these characteristics are also exhibited by individuals with higher-functioning autism, though, again, probably to a lesser extent.  More typically, autistic persons are withdrawn and may seem to be unaware of, and disinterested in, other persons.  Individuals with AS, on the other hand, are often keen, sometimes painfully so, to relate to others, but lack the skills to successfully engage them.
 
Qualitative Impairment in Communication
 
In contrast to autism, there are no symptoms in this area of functioning in the definition of AS.  Although significant abnormalities of speech are not typical of AS, there are at least three aspects of these individuals’ communication skills, which are of clinical interest.  First, though inflection and intonation may not be as rigid and monotonic as in autism, speech may be marked by poor prosody.  For example, there may be a constricted range of intonation patterns that is used with little regard to the communicative functioning of the utterance (assertions of fact, humorous remarks, etc.).  Second, speech often is tangential and circumstantial, conveying a sense of looseness of associations and incoherence.  Even though in some cases this symptom may be an indicator of a possible thought disorder, it is often the case that the lack of coherence and reciprocity in speech is a result of the one-sided, egocentric conversational style (e.g., unrelenting monologues about the names, codes, and attributes of innumerable TV stations in the country), failure to provide the background for comments and to clearly demarcate changes in topic, and failure to suppress the vocal output accompanying internal thoughts.

The third aspect typifying the communication patterns of individuals with AS concerns the marked verbosity observed, which some authors see as one of the most prominent differential features of the disorder.  The child or adult may talk incessantly, usually about their favorite subject, often in complete disregard to whether the listener might be interested, engaged, or attempting to interject a comment, or change the subject of conversation.  Despite such long-winded monologues, the individual may never come to a point or conclusion. Attempts by the interlocutor to elaborate on issues of centent or logic, or to shift the interchange to related topics, are often unsuccessful.

Despite the possibility that all of these symptoms may be accounted for in terms of significant deficits in pragmatics skills and/or lack of insight into, and awareness of, other people’s expectations, the challenge remains to understand this phenomenon developmentally as strategies of social adaptation.
 
Restrictive, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities
 
Although in the DSM-IV definition the criteria for AS and autism are identical, requiring the presence of at least one of the symptoms in the list provided (see table above), it appears that the most commonly observed symptom in this cluster refers to an encompassing preoccupation with restricted patterns of interest.  In contrast to autism, where other symptoms in this area may be very pronounced, individuals with AS are not commonly reported to exhibit them with the exception of the all-absorbing preoccupation with an unusual and circumscribed topic, about which vast amounts of factual knowledge are acquired and all too readily demonstrated at the first opportunity in social interaction.  Although the actual topic may change from time to time (e.g., every year or two years), it may dominate the content of social interchange as well as the activities of individuals with AS, often immersing the whole family in the subject for long periods of time.  Even though this symptom may not be easily recognized in childhood (because strong interests in dinosaurs or fashionable fictional characters are so ubiquitous among young children), it may become more salient later on as interests shift to unusual and narrow topics. This behavior is peculiar in the sense that often times extraordinary amounts of factual information are learned about very circumscribed topics (e.g., snakes, names of stars, maps, TV guides, or railway schedules).
 
Motor Clumsiness
 
In addition to the required criteria specified above, an additional symptom is given as an associated feature though not a required criterion for the diagnosis of AS, namely delayed motor milestones and presence of “motor clumsiness”.  Individuals with AS may have a history of delayed acquisition of motor skills such as pedaling a bike, catching a ball, opening jars, climbing on “monkey-bars”, and so on. They are often visibly awkward, exhibiting rigid gait patterns, odd posture, poor manipulative skills, and significant deficits in visual-motor coordination.  Although this presentation contrasts with the pattern of motor development in autistic children, for whom the area of motor skills is often a relative strength, it is similar in some respects to what is observed in older autistic individuals.  Nevertheless, the commonality in later life may result from different underlying factors, for example, psychomotor deficits in the case of AS, and poor body image and sense of self in the case of autism.  This highlights the importance of describing this symptom in developmental terms.
 
Assessment

AS, like other pervasive developmental disorders (PDD’s), involves delays and deviant patterns of behavior in multiple areas of functioning, that often require the input of professionals with different areas of expertise, particularly overall developmental functioning, neuropsychological features, and behavioral status.  Hence an experienced interdisciplinary team most effectively conducts the clinical assessment of individuals with this disorder.

A few principles should be made explicit prior to a discussion of the various areas of assessment.  First, given the complexity of the condition, importance of developmental history, and common difficulties in securing adequate services for children and individuals with AS, it is very important that parents are encouraged to observe and participate in the evaluation.  This guideline helps to demystify assessment procedures, avails the parents of shared observations that can then be clarified by the clinician, and fosters parental understanding of the child’s condition.  All of these can then help the parents evaluate the programs of intervention offered in their community.

Second, evaluation findings should be translated into a single coherent view of the child: easily understood, detailed, concrete, and elastic recommendations should be provided.  When writing their reports, professionals should strive to express the implications of their findings to the patient’s day-to-day adaptation, learning, and vocational training.

Third, the lack of awareness of many professionals and officials of the disorder, its features, and associated disabilities often necessitates direct and continuous contact on the part of the evaluators with the various professionals securing and implementing the recommended interventions.  This is particularly important in the case of AS, as most of these individuals have average levels of Full Scale IQ, and are often thought of as in need for special programming.  Conversely, as AS becomes a more well-known diagnostic label, there is reason to believe that it is becoming a fashionable concept used in an often inwarranted fashion by practitioners who intend to convey only that their client is currently experiencing difficulties in social interaction and in peer relationships.  The disorder is meant as a serious and debilitating developmental syndrome impairing the person’s capacity for socialization and not a transient or mild condition.  Therefore, parents should be briefed about the present unsatisfactory state of knowledge about AS and the common confusions of use and abuse of the disorder currently prevailing in the mental health community.  Ample opportunity should be given to clarify misconceptions and establish a consensus about the patient’s abilities and disabilities, which should not be simply assumed under the use of the diagnostic label.

In the majority of cases, a comprehensive assessment will involve the following components: History, psychological assessment, communication and psychiatric assessments, further consultation if needed, parental conferences, and recommendations.
 
History
 
A careful history should be obtained, including information related to pregnancy and neonatal period, early development and characteristics of development, and medical and family history.  A review of previous records including previous evaluations should be performed and the information incorporated and results compared in order to obtain a sense of course of development.  Additionally, several other specific areas should be 
directly examined because of their importance in the diagnosis of AS.

These include a careful history of onset/recognition of the problems, development of motor skills, language patterns, and areas of special interest (e.g., favorite occupations, unusual skills, and collections).  Particular emphasis should be placed on social development, including past and present problems in social interaction, patterns of attachment of family members, development of friendships, self-concept, emotional development, and mood presentation.

 

SIGN IN
User Name:
Password:
Click here to join!
SHORTCUTS
ADVERTISEMENT